Our waking experience is mostly if not wholly in the past.
In waking consciousness, when I focus on my mind’s experience, only on my
thoughts or imagination, there is perhaps a synchronicity of experience and the
thing I am considering in the sense that the clock of my experience is not a
clock outside my mind’s sense of the passage of time. If I take the clock of my
now to be the experience itself as it occurs with no reference to time passing
outside the experience itself I can claim synchronized coincidence of a
present, a moment of now, and my experience. I may claim simultaneity of my
experience of thought and the thought itself, of feeling, experiencing the
feeling and the sentiment as I have it if I use as the measure of time the
sequence of sentience itself. Then perhaps I can say the present is what I am
experiencing without a lag in time for the senses to bring perception to me for
interpretation. Is it possible in waking life for that to be truly simultaneous
or is it always genuinely always a bit behind the actual moment of now? Is
there always actually a sense of outside time, a lapse between the synaptic
moment and what the activity of the brain and mind considers? What is the
mathematical rendering, the expression in calculus of that?
What about dreams? In dream time does that outside
reference, that inkling of outside time disappear or at least narrow further,
bringing closer the clock of instants passing, the distance between the thing
and the thought, that gap of conveyance of information to the mind from the
object considered? Is the stuff of dreams perhaps closer to a simultaneous
experience of now, of the present moment? If we could put a clock on our dreams
solely in the mind would there still be that same lag between the mechanics of
the mind and the objects generated solely in the mind? Can we claim the only
valid clock of a dream is the present experience of the dream itself and
therefore the dreamer experiences the lapse between brain activity and the
generation of dream content and the experience of those dream things as one and
the same? Or does the waking sense of time impose itself there in the dream as
well? Are the same chemical transfers in the brain required in the dream as in
the outside world for us to respond to dream things which are things only in
the mind? The mind works only with that lag perhaps. What is our subjective
impression, even in a dream? Could the lapse in a dream be an illusion carried
over from waking consciousness, even though in sleep the reality the dreamer dreams
and experiences, the dream itself happen simultaneously? Has the dreamer in
fact caught up with now, thereby gaining rest? Is it perhaps the lag in time
when we are awake which makes us tired?
In the morning I wake and try to recall the dream moments,
the recollected experience of the present, an experience of a now left behind,
a simultaneity in the moment, a now now lost. I am always seeking a place
nearer to now, approaching the moment, falling short, perhaps only in dreams
achieving that place somewhere nearer to now.
What about the experience in the womb, the dream state in
the womb, and experiences not wholly asleep, not wholly waking? What is the
valid clock of those moments for consciousness? The mind is only forming and at
the first moment of consciousness could there be a first instance where the
lapse is less or nonexistent? Just prior to that could there be a true
simultaneous moment, a now we experience even as it occurs, and is that similar
to the actual act of conception itself, if only as a half remembered dream?
Now I search my mind for that moment of initial conception
with the firm knowledge that as I approach it, however closely, even as I touch
it, it is an illusion of now, an illusion in memory dissipating in a lapsed
experience of infinitesimal time I can never bridge, the atom of my first self
on my own eve of being, my spark of an essence once touched never to be
reached, a snowflake, a light particle escaping my effort to grasp it by the
very act of experiencing, melting away in the passion to regain its infinitely
remote intimacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment